Web Stats Provided By Google Analytics

Monday, May 24, 2010

05/24/10 Westchester County Resident And US Senate Candidate Michael Sepe Tells Us About PMDs, Politicians of Massive Destruction


Click To Enlarge Image

Sepe for Senate Committee
PO Box 881
Harrison, New York 10528

http://Sepe2010.com

Facebook: Michael Sepe for Senator


Press release 40:

PMDs, Politicians of Massive Destruction

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are requesting another 19 billion dollars of bailout money from Congress. No one should forget that Charles Schumer orchestrated what historians will call “The Biggest Fraud ever perpetrated on the American People in the history of our Nation.”

In the 12 years Senator Schumer has been on both the “Senate Banking Committee” and the “Senate Committee on Housing and Urban Development” thousands of banks went bankrupt, trillions of dollars of retirement, investment and taxpayer money were wiped out, millions of jobs were lost, the value of everyone’s homes dropped 30 to 40 percent and millions of homes have gone into foreclosure. The sole duty of these Senate Committees was to make sure that the “Stability and Integrity” of our Financial Institutions and Housing were never compromised. How do you rate the job Schumer did? Give him your answer on November 2, 2010.

Senator Schumer led the team to bail out the banks saying they were “Too big to fail.” What he meant was that they were “Too big of Campaign Contributors to him and other Senators to fail.” In fact, in a free market, there is no such thing as “Too big to fail.” Risk of failure and failure itself are key ingredients in free markets. Failure allows the system to cleanse itself of the reckless and stupid players. Failure allows more responsible and smarter players to move up and move our financial system forward. Now we are stuck with the same people that got us in this mess in the first place, giving even more campaign contributions to the Senators that led the financial institutions to the abyss. How do you rate the job Schumer did? Give him your answer on November 2, 2010.

Senator Schumer says he had to bail out the banks to avoid a depression. Unfortunately, those who lost their jobs are depressed, 80% of University students who graduated and cannot find a job are depressed, 30% of Americans who saw their salaries drastically cut are depressed, 100% of homeowners who lost 30% to 40% of the value of their homes are depressed, investors who had their life savings wiped out are depressed and finally 99% of Americans who will be taxed to death to pay for this mess are depressed. The remaining 1% got the bailouts and bonuses. Schumer didn’t lie, he prevented his banking friends from becoming depressed. How do you rate the job Schumer did? Give him your answer on November 2, 2010.

Senator Schumer says the banks are paying back the tarp money. Does anyone really believe these bankers reached into their own pockets to pay this money back?

The fact is that anyone who saw a massive increase in interest rates on their credit card bill is paying back the tarp money.

Anyone who used the ATM and paid the now doubled fee is paying back the tarp money.

Anyone who over-drafted their account with their debit card and paid the $35 fee is paying back the tarp money.

Anyone “day trading” and losing is paying back the tarp money because these banks have the power to manipulate the value of stocks.

Anyone buying fuel is paying back the tarp money because these banks have the power to manipulate to price of fuel oil.

The truth is 100% of the tarp money is being paid back by everyone but the bankers that received it. How do you rate the job Schumer did? Give him your answer on November 2, 2010.

The Senate is currently writing more regulations for banks at the same time, Schumer has spent the last three months with his fellow democrats parading them through Wall Street shaking down every banker for more campaign contributions. The new regulations do not touch Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, stock manipulation or fuel oil price fixing. These proposed new regulations are useless. If Americans really want to stop the nonsense on Wall Street, we must start having these guys explain themselves in front of a judge and 12 of their peers. How do you rate the job Schumer did? Give him your answer on November 2, 2010.

Every banker and every Democratic Senator on the Senate Banking Committee knew exactly what they were exposing the American public to and they chose to do it anyway. The bankers made billions in bonuses and lost nothing, Schumer and friends made billions in campaign contributions and lost nothing. Everyone else lost. Americans will continue to lose, if we do not remove Schumer and everyone like him from office this November 2. There is no one more dangerous to the welfare of all Americans and our Nation than Senator Schumer.

No comments:

Popular Mount Vernon Roundup Posts

Resources For Critical Readers

The critical readers of Mount Vernon Roundup know that when reading, viewing, or listening to any local "mainstream" news report or blog post, the main thing to realize is that truth and objectivity may be partialy obscured or totaly absent.

While local "mainstream" media outlets and blogs often self-righteously proclaimed that only the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, is published, the critical reader knows that local news reports in "mainstream" media have three primary purposes: (a) to entice their readers, (b) to be "politically correct" so as not to offend the powers that be, and (c) to lure advertisers by showing the number of docile readers the local publication draws.

Beyond these less than honorable motivations listed above, local "mainstream" reporters, editors and especially publishers are also prone to inject their own personal prejudices and biases, either consciously or unconsciously.

The critical reader should be aware of these potential problems.The critical reader needs to have many questions in his mind when examining local "mainstream" media items and blog posts.

Many times the vocabulary employed by local "mainstream" journalists and editors is often pejorative and very value laden.

Actually, this is an argument in and of itself that there is a bias.It is up to the critical reader to point this out by means of blog posts and letters to the local "mainstream" newspaper editors and publishers..

There are honest and objective local "Mainstream" journalists, editors and publishers who try and produce a newsppaper that presents all sides of every issue.

However, these local journalists, editors and publishers who have succeed in resisting the pressures to be biased are few and far between.

Many times the critical reader will discover that these local "mainstream" journalists, editors and publishers cave in to pressures, and/or who are prejudiced and nonobjective by nature.

It is therefore up to the critical reader to carefully evaluate and then reject or accept the claims and assertions that are made in any given news story or blog post.

Local "mainstream" journalists, editors and publishers need to make sure they produce well-researched articles that are based on objective description of empirical facts.

One of the goals of Mount Vernon Roundup is to help these local "Mainstream" journalists, editors and publishers need to strive to convey reality and contribute to enlightenment of Mount Vernon.

However, the critical reader must understand that journalism which abandons these criteria can be misleading and destructive, pandering to the powers that be rather than courageously and honorably serving truth and justice

Resources for Letter Writers

Mount Vernon Roundup publishes email addresses for reporters, editors, and publishers when such addresses are publicly made available.

We encourage our reader to send intelligent, civil, and reasonable emails to these journalists, editors and publishers.

However, a critical reader who sends some correspondence to an email address obtained from this website is, in one sense, representing this blog.

What the writer says, and how it is said, reflects directly on Mount Vernon in general and on this site in particular.

Local "mainstream" reporters, editors and publishers are interested in deadlines and getting stories written that people will read.

If a critical reader can help them do that, then their contributions will be greatly appreciated.

Remember, good stories are factual and well organized, but they also communicate something of the human spirit.

Likewise, letters to local "mainstream" reporters, editors and publishers, while based on heartfelt convictions, also should be well organized, with points and logic developed in a rational sequence.

Proper grammar, spelling, and capitalization also help the local "mainsteam" reporter, editor or publisher view the received letter as worthy of serious consideration.

Brevity and conciseness are very important, and a long-winded rambling discourse is not likely to be given serious consideration.

For that matter, a "letter" does not even have to be a letter, a single sentence can get a point across.

Nor does a letter have to be for publication or even come from a verifiable source, all it needs to do is provide valid food for thought.

Resources For Blog Comments

More and more local "mainstream" media-sponsored web sites are providing submission forms or links where anyone and everyone can post "comments" on their stories.

Some sites also provide various forums of one type or another.However, these forums may require registration.

Many of the comments, suggestions, and cautions that we have provided the critical reader about the submission of comments are very applicable to participation in these forums.

There are no established "standards" for the submission of these comments, and it is necessary and important to very carefully read the instructions, requirements, and limitations for submitting your comments.

Some local "mainstream" newspaper or blog sites may ask for a name, but these are not checked, so there is no need to use your real name if you do not want to.

Other local "mainstream" newspaper or blog sites may allow only a first name, some may permit the inclusions of URL references, links, HTML code, and email addresses, whereas others may not.

When submitting such comments, it is important to "take the high road."Personal attacks, hatefulness, rash accusations, snide insinuations, misleading assertions, and outright lies are the stock in trade of many posters, but the most effective way to disarm and dismiss these posts is to rise far above such tactics.

Name-calling, abrasiveness, unsupported and insupportable assertions, and otherwise descending to the level of negative posters' inanities not only undermines one's credibility, but reduces the likelihood that one's comments will be accepted and printed.

Submissions should be brief and concise.

Two or three short paragraphs is about all that the average reader will assimilate .

Be polite, but factual.

Try to deal with reality, and not with far out ideas or wishful thinking.

Take your own concept or idea and address it as thoughtfully, professionally, and concisely as possible.

But first read the existing comments and make sure you are not repeating what someone else has already posted.

Suggest a News Story

Mount Vernon Roundup is a website that encourages fair, accurate, and complete media reports and blog posts about the people and events in and around Mount Vernon.

If you would like to be one of Mount Vernon's newest ethical journalists that is willing to report the complete truth about the diversity and magnitude of the human experience in our city, then please submit your news story to....

MountVernonRoundup@gmail.com

Or if you have a blog about Mount Vernon, then submit links to your blog posts to.....

MountVernonRoundup@gmail.com

Or if you have a news tip or story idea, then submit these items to....

MountVernonRoundup@gmail.com

Or if you notice news or blog links concerning Mount Vernon, then send them to......

MountVernonRoundup@gmail.com

Please include contact information with the items you submit to us.

You will not be contacted unless your submission has a problem or is unusable.